| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |
| Date: | 2008-03-14 21:10:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20080314141017.4a5e8416@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:03:35 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Well, that is not "general". Name it pgsql-us-usergroup or something
> then. The pgsql-eu-general list isn't general either. It's a
> mistake. Let's be more precise and accurate in the future.
Peter if this was a concern for you, I wish you would have brought it
up sooner... We have:
pgsql-fr-generale
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-tr-genel
pgsql-eu-general
pgsql-it-generale
and now we are requesting pgsql-us-general.
So either they are all mistakes, or?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2um5ATb/zqfZUUQRAqemAJ0XFWkm38bgjDZLnXopYwLnRd88+ACfczD5
aweBVjX+tfoWlg0AczB75s8=
=5/eO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-14 21:11:21 | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-03-14 21:07:41 | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |