Re: postgre vs MySQL

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, rrahul <rahul(dot)rathi(at)cognizant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgre vs MySQL
Date: 2008-03-14 01:31:07
Message-ID: 20080313183107.3155618a@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:27 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Marketing. Remember that MySQL AB have a strong financial incentive
> to make organized efforts to locate and publicize impressive-sounding
> users of MySQL. (I've heard rumors they even give licensing discounts
> to companies that will let their names be used like that.)

That's fairly standard practice. We have actually had customers try and
negotiate that with us. "If you give us a discount you can use our name
in xyz...". Of course, we don't :) but then again that's why you don't
see our name attached to large rollouts (even though you can see large
rollouts attached to us.)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH2dVdATb/zqfZUUQRAjFWAJ9MJibdGfK+mV7ZcOnsi2BK5j5k2wCcCh7t
zRi1usSR6m/zgLV2BEcUG7w=
=7h9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2008-03-14 03:10:42 Re: postgre vs MySQL
Previous Message Chris Browne 2008-03-14 01:30:49 Re: postgre vs MySQL