Re: postgre vs MySQL

From: Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: rrahul <rahul(dot)rathi(at)cognizant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: postgre vs MySQL
Date: 2008-03-13 23:12:47
Message-ID: 200803131612.47457.aklaver@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 13 March 2008 5:36 am, rrahul wrote:
> Thanks to all you wonderful people out their. I don't know if its your love
> for Postgres or nepothism that makes it look far superior than mysql.
> But why does the client list dosen't tell that?
> I see Mysql bosting for Google,Yahoo, Alcatel......
> What about Postgres the list is not that impressive.

There is an old saying "If 'everybody' else is jumping off a cliff should you
too?" Years ago I played around with MySQL because that was what "everybody"
was using. The problem was it did not do what I wanted and Postgres did. Be
less concerned with marketing lists and more concerned with what the software
can help you do. Draw up a list of things you need in a database and then use
the previous answers to decide which database better serves your needs.

>
> Are their any major implementations that moved from Mysql to Postgres?
> Howmany out their have done this or will advice to do that?
>
> cheers,
> Rahul.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/postgre-vs-MySQL-tp15976517p16024988.html Sent from
> the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2008-03-13 23:19:06 Re: Dump format for long term archiving.
Previous Message Colin Wetherbee 2008-03-13 23:10:35 Re: Is there a way to elegantly do a : CREATE TEMP TABLE X AS SELECT .... ON COMMIT DROP