Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Date: 2008-03-11 15:48:22
Message-ID: 20080311154822.GS9116@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Hmm, AFAIR subsequent investigation led to the discovery that autovacuum
> is not affected by statement_timeout.

Right -- see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/80044/focus=93847

So your documentation changes are incorrect.

--
Alvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile ICBM: S 39º 48' 55.3", W 73º 15' 24.7"
"You knock on that door or the sun will be shining on places inside you
that the sun doesn't usually shine" (en Death: "The High Cost of Living")

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 15:53:21 Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-11 15:46:43 Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout