Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Date: 2008-03-11 15:46:43
Message-ID: 20080311154643.GR9116@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I have added a TODO:
>
> > o Set up autovacuum to ignore statement_timeout set in
> > postgresql.conf
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg01753.php
>
> and documented this behavior with the attached patch; backpatched to 8.3.X.

Hmm, AFAIR subsequent investigation led to the discovery that autovacuum
is not affected by statement_timeout.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 15:48:22 Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 15:44:00 Re: Background LRU Writer/free list