Re: [GENERAL] end of life for pg versions...

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] end of life for pg versions...
Date: 2008-02-12 23:01:13
Message-ID: 200802122301.m1CN1Dr02325@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> > Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one could make a
> > strong argument for a static url for EOL info now that windows is EOL for <
> > 8.2.
>
> You could make a strong argument for a page stating that versions
> thus-and-so are *already* EOL'd. What the OP seems to be insisting
> is that we produce a formal policy and timetable for future EOL
> decisions, neither of which seem very likely or desirable to me.

We could record the dates we made versions EOL and they can interpolate
from there.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2008-02-12 23:21:40 Re: "advanced" database design (long)
Previous Message Koen Vermeer 2008-02-12 22:41:15 Storing images as BYTEA or large objects

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-02-12 23:45:06 Re: Patch review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-12 22:13:15 Re: [GENERAL] end of life for pg versions...