Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility
Date: 2008-01-09 17:13:09
Message-ID: 20080109171309.GF28750@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:03:59AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> And if, for some god forsaken reason, you need to operate on that
> number, there's always "lock table"...

Yes. You could also store the data in ISAM :-P

> I feel dirty. :)

You should. Go wash your brain out with soap. LOCK TABLE indeed.

A

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Harrison 2008-01-09 17:19:11 Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-01-09 17:11:56 Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore