Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore
Date: 2008-01-09 17:11:56
Message-ID: 20080109171155.GE28750@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Josh Harrison wrote:

> accessed frequently. So clustering the table according to one index will
> yield poor performance to queries involving other indexes.

Maybe not poor, but certainly not optimised.

> Index-only scan is a good solution for this I guess for queries involving
> indexed columns (like in oracle) !!!

I think I don't know what you mean by "index-only scan". Oracle can't be
returning you data just by scanning an index, can it? It needs to get the
tuple if you need it back.

My bet is that you haven't tuned your vacuums correctly, or you aren't doing
ANALYSE often enough on the affected tables, or you need to SET STATISTICS
higher on some of the columns in order to get better estimates (and
therefore better plans).

A

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-01-09 17:13:09 Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-01-09 17:03:59 Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility