From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Howard Cole <howardnews(at)selestial(dot)com>, "'PgSql General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Killing a session in windows |
Date: | 2007-12-17 14:01:36 |
Message-ID: | 200712171401.lBHE1ak21677@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > Huh, why is it awkward?
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you can send the signal directly using <command>kill</>
> > > (or <command>pg_ctl kill TERM [process id]</>).
> >
> > I think we should mention Windows in there somewhere, because it isn't
> > "alternatively" on Windows.
>
> Actually, this whole change is a bit silly, because the text now says
> something like:
>
> "You can send these signals using pg_ctl kill. Alternatively you can
> use kill (or pg_ctl kill)"
Wow, yea, I see that now, but it is alone a paragraph above. I updated
the text to:
The <xref linkend="app-pg-ctl"> program provides a convenient
interface for sending these signals to shut down the server.
Alternatively, you can send the signal directly using
<command>kill</> on non-Windows systems.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH | 2007-12-17 14:15:16 | slony error --need help |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-12-17 13:56:11 | Re: Killing a session in windows |