| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Howard Cole <howardnews(at)selestial(dot)com>, "'PgSql General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Killing a session in windows |
| Date: | 2007-12-17 13:56:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20071217135611.GE5637@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Huh, why is it awkward?
> >
> > Alternatively, you can send the signal directly using <command>kill</>
> > (or <command>pg_ctl kill TERM [process id]</>).
>
> I think we should mention Windows in there somewhere, because it isn't
> "alternatively" on Windows.
Actually, this whole change is a bit silly, because the text now says
something like:
"You can send these signals using pg_ctl kill. Alternatively you can
use kill (or pg_ctl kill)"
In my opinion this change should be reverted.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-17 14:01:36 | Re: Killing a session in windows |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-17 13:45:30 | Re: Killing a session in windows |