From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-27 02:04:37 |
Message-ID: | 200709262204.37783.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 17:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> FYI, I live near Philadelphia, but everyone here calls it "Philly", and
> there are even companies that use the name like "Philly Pretzel
> Company", http://www.phillysoftpretzelfactory.com/pretzelstory.html. I
> don't call it "Philly" when I am out of the country because few people
> recognize it outside the USA. Anyway, to me it shows an alias can get
> general usage without renaming the city, but I do think we should
> promote the alias in a focused way.
So, I took a look at the philadelphia government website, just to see how much
the philadelphia "promotes" the use of the term philly, like you want to do
with Postgres. Doing a quick search, I get the following results:
Documents 1 to 5 of 14079 matching the query "philadelphia"
Documents 1 to 5 of 772 matching the query "philly"
If my math is right (and surely you can double check that for me) that's about
1% of the use of the term philly vs philadelphia. That doesn't seem like
strong promotion.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} Postgre
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2007-09-27 02:09:55 | Cafeconf 2007 |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-09-27 02:04:35 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |