From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-26 21:30:08 |
Message-ID: | 200709262130.l8QLU8p13757@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >> Note that this may be worth while in the future, but all things come in
> >> time and I don't think this is the right time.
> >
> > I thought you thought the FAQ alias usage was OK? I also don't see
> > waiting as fruitful.
>
> Yes I am OK with the FAQ. I however do see waiting (not on the FAQ but
> on the docs) as fruitful.
OK, good, let's see how people feel about the FAQ changes and if it
helps.
I do think having "PostgreSQL" lots of places in the same paragraph is
kind of long-winded, so I do think additional uses of "Postgres" will
be good.
FYI, I live near Philadelphia, but everyone here calls it "Philly", and
there are even companies that use the name like "Philly Pretzel
Company", http://www.phillysoftpretzelfactory.com/pretzelstory.html. I
don't call it "Philly" when I am out of the country because few people
recognize it outside the USA. Anyway, to me it shows an alias can get
general usage without renaming the city, but I do think we should
promote the alias in a focused way.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-09-26 21:32:09 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-26 21:24:15 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |