From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Romain Roure <romain(dot)roure(at)persee(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Duplicate public schema and user tables |
Date: | 2007-09-26 16:37:11 |
Message-ID: | 20070926163711.GA24118@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Romain Roure wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We suddenly stumbled upon duplicate entities. Some of our databases
> ended up with two 'public' schemas and several duplicate user tables
> (sharing the same oid).
> After checking through the logs, it doesn't appear to be a problem
> resulting from wrap-around OID's. Though the logs mention
> transaction-wraparound may have happened.
Please shouw us the xmin,xmax columns to the pg_class tables. But if
you've wrapped around so far to get old column, then you passed the
wraparound horizon 2 billion transactions ago. Please show us exactly
what the logs say:
Oh, and do you have any backups?
> We're running PostgreSQL 8.0.1. Any help would be appreciated.
You need to be running VACUUM...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-09-26 16:40:22 | Re: Filesystem crash - corupted database |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-09-26 16:32:41 | Re: CLUSTER = slower vacuum? |