| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER = slower vacuum? |
| Date: | 2007-09-26 16:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20070926163241.GH8572@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Phoenix Kiula escribió:
> After I clustered the primary key index of a table with about 300,000
> rows, my vacuum/analyze on that table is taking too long ... over 15
> mins when originally it was 15 seconds! Nothing else has been changed
> with this table. Is clustering not good for vacuums?
No. Something else must be happening. Maybe examine the output of
vacuum verbose to see where the time is going?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-09-26 16:37:11 | Re: Duplicate public schema and user tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-26 16:27:16 | Re: Poor performance with ON DELETE CASCADE |