Re: SAN vs Internal Disks

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
Date: 2007-09-07 18:18:42
Message-ID: 200709071118.42749@hal.simkin.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Friday 07 September 2007 10:56, "Bryan Murphy"
<bryan(dot)murphy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Our database server connects to the san via iSCSI over Gig/E using
> jumbo frames. File system is XFS (noatime).
>
> Throughput, however, kinda sucks. I just can't get the kind of
> throughput to it I was hoping to get.

A single Gig/E couldn't even theoretically do better than 125MB/sec, so
yeah I would expect throughput sucks pretty bad.

--
"A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for
lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the
decision." -- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Hurt 2007-09-07 18:21:52 Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
Previous Message Bryan Murphy 2007-09-07 17:56:20 Re: SAN vs Internal Disks