From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Code examples |
Date: | 2007-09-04 09:01:54 |
Message-ID: | 200709041101.54641.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Am Dienstag, 4. September 2007 02:39 schrieb Tom Lane:
> C code that's been hacked until it passes for SGML isn't compilable.
I don't understand this point. Why would SGML care what the C code looks
like?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-04 13:53:01 | Re: tsearch filenames unlikes special symbols and numbers |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-09-04 05:04:27 | Re: tsearch filenames unlikes special symbols and numbers |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-09-04 09:16:31 | Re: Updatable cursor doubt |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2007-09-04 07:44:49 | Desirable standard library of Kerberos at windows. |