From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Ben Tilly" <btilly(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: tsearch filenames unlikes special symbols and numbers |
Date: | 2007-09-04 05:04:27 |
Message-ID: | 162867790709032204m1895d36ci78de7d4f4e759655@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
2007/9/4, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Ben Tilly" <btilly(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 9/3/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> There seems fairly clear use-case for allowing A-Z a-z 0-9 and
> >> underscore (while CVS head rejects 0-9 and underscore).
>
> > The problem with allowing uppercase letters is that on some
> > filesystems foo and Foo are the same file, and on others they are not.
> > This may lead to obscure portability problems where code worked fine
> > on Unix and then fails when the database is running on Windows.
>
> Yeah, good point. So far it seems that a-z 0-9 and underscore cover the
> real use-cases, so what say we just allow those for now? It's a lot
> easier to loosen up later than tighten up ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
It's system specific. I prefere a-z and A-Z. Clasic name for
dictionaries combine lower and upper characters .. for czech
cs_CZ_UTF8 etc.
dictfile = cs_CZ_UTF8 ... automatic convert to cs_cz_utf8.dict
dictfile = 'cs_CZ_UTF8' .. check and use cs_CZ_UTF8
Regards
Pavel Stehule
p.s. it's important on UNIX platforms and without any efect on windows.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-09-04 09:01:54 | Re: Code examples |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-04 00:39:54 | Re: Code examples |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2007-09-04 06:15:33 | Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked |
Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-04 02:41:58 | Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked |