From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Subject: | Re: A couple of tsearch loose ends |
Date: | 2007-08-22 07:34:27 |
Message-ID: | 200708220934.30474.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi list,
Le mardi 21 août 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
> CREATE TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY swedish (
> TEMPLATE = snowball,
> LANGUAGE = swedish,
> STOPWORDS = swedish
> );
>
> ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY swedish (
> STOPWORDS
> );
>
> this dictionary would have LANGUAGE = swedish and no stopwords option.
>
> Any objections to changing it like that?
I don't understand why this ALTER variation is so different from existing
ones, but maybe the following syntax can't work:
ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY swedish ALTER STOPWORDS SET swedish;
For dropping an option, could one of those commands do?
ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY swedish DROP STOPWORDS;
ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY swedish ALTER STOPWORDS SET NULL;
Not sure if it's doable or if it really looks more like other ALTER commands,
but I think I'd like it more this way :)
Hope this helps,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-08-22 08:32:52 | Re: Is ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION PARSER = new_parser really sane? |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-08-22 06:59:02 | Re: HOT patch, missing things |