From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Still recommending daily vacuum... |
Date: | 2007-07-02 21:52:22 |
Message-ID: | 20070702215222.GS85497@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
From
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/routine-vacuuming.html :
"Recommended practice for most sites is to schedule a database-wide
VACUUM once a day at a low-usage time of day, supplemented by more
frequent vacuuming of heavily-updated tables if necessary. (Some
installations with extremely high update rates vacuum their busiest
tables as often as once every few minutes.) If you have multiple
databases in a cluster, don't forget to VACUUM each one; the program
vacuumdb might be helpful."
Do we still want that to be our formal recommendation? ISTM it would be
more logical to recommend a combination of autovac, daily vacuumdb -a if
you can afford it and have a quiet period, and frequent manual vacuuming
of things like web session tables.
I'm happy to come up with a patch, but I figure there should be
consensus first...
--
Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-03 00:46:34 | Re: what is difference between LOCAL and GLOBAL TEMP TABLES in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-07-02 21:23:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix PGXS conventions so that extensions can be built against |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-07-02 22:00:18 | Re: pg_ctl -w (wait) option on Windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-02 20:57:22 | Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler |