From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |
Date: | 2007-05-16 18:02:32 |
Message-ID: | 200705161802.l4GI2WM12558@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In talking to people who are assigned to review patches or could review
> > patches, I often get the reply, "Oh, yea, I need to do that".
> >
> > Folks, we are six weeks into feature freeze and have made slim progress
> > on getting patches reviewed and applied. As I stated earlier, we are
> > now looking at August/September for beta, but that might be pushed back
> > even later if we don't get more progress.
> >
> > It seems there is a lot of reliance on Tom to get the patches applied,
> > but I don't think that is fair or reasonable. I think we need more
> > urgency on the part of everyone to make faster progress. Patch
> > reviewers and committers need to take more initiative to get things done
> > rather than wait for some external force to prompt them.
> >
> >
>
> I at least feel uncomfortable about reviewing code that deals with areas
> I have not touched much, and where I feel the author probably knows a
> lot more than me. The chance of my catching errors/problems in such a
> case is much lower.
Yep, that is part of our problem, but even items people have already
said they _can_ review have shown little progress.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-05-16 18:06:26 | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-16 17:54:46 | Re: Invalid magic number in log file? |