From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
Date: | 2007-04-11 08:27:02 |
Message-ID: | 20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people
> > moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time
> > to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the
> > two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe
> > recruit a few more moderators?
>
> Which lists are slow? I tend to moderate in real time whilst I'm awake,
> or at least the next time I check my mail when not (which is invariably
> only a few hours away). I can probably add another couple to my list if
> that would help.
In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
was referring to, also -hackers.
(I did bug you about -patches and -committers, which you said you couldn't
do :-P)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-11 08:36:03 | Very slow rsync of ftp site |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-11 07:43:06 | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |