| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
| Date: | 2007-04-11 14:26:22 |
| Message-ID: | 14128.1176301582@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Which lists are slow?
> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
> was referring to, also -hackers.
At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but
I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice
batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together,
perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention
to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is
most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but
I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly
likely to get submissions from non-subscribers.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-04-11 15:30:47 | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-04-11 13:28:40 | Re: Very slow rsync of ftp site |