Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-16 15:00:18
Message-ID: 200702161500.l1GF0II01547@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan escribi?:
>
> > Looks to me like the timestamptz test relies on the timestamp test (for
> > timestamp_tbl) but they are set to run in parallel, so we have a race
> > condition. Oops!
>
> Good catch :-)
>
> I'd guess the answer is to move the tests using the timestamp_tbl to the
> timestamp test.

OK, will do. Thanks for the diagnosis.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-16 15:11:27 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-16 14:45:17 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates