Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-16 14:45:17
Message-ID: 20070216144517.GF13241@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan escribió:

> Looks to me like the timestamptz test relies on the timestamp test (for
> timestamp_tbl) but they are set to run in parallel, so we have a race
> condition. Oops!

Good catch :-)

I'd guess the answer is to move the tests using the timestamp_tbl to the
timestamp test.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-16 15:00:18 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-02-16 14:05:56 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates