| From: | Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | stafford(at)marine(dot)rutgers(dot)edu, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier |
| Date: | 2006-11-20 20:29:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20061120202901.59355.qmail@web55404.mail.re4.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I'm guessing that is an Oracle-ism for the sql DISTINCT keyword.
Regards,
Shelby Cain
----- Original Message ----
From: Wm.A.Stafford <stafford(at)marine(dot)rutgers(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:13:13 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier
I hope the subject says it all. I'm porting an Oracle-centric
application to PostgreSQL and the Oracle sql is full of the 'unique'
qualifier. I'm assuming PostgreSQL does not support 'unique' since
don't see a 'unique' anywhere in the PostgreSQL docs. Is there a
substitute or a technique to get the same result?
Thanks,
-=bill stafford
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link
Don't quit your job - take classes online
www.Classesusa.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Troy | 2006-11-20 21:06:25 | Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier |
| Previous Message | Wm.A.Stafford | 2006-11-20 20:27:39 | More on unique vs distinct |