From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Date: | 2006-11-20 15:03:02 |
Message-ID: | 200611201503.kAKF32U19682@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > That's true of simple query broadcasting (ie: pgpool), but not true ?
> > of Continuent/Sequoia. Continuent's software adds a lot of additional ?
> > features on top of simple query broadcasting, making it far more ?
> > robust than simply spewing queries out to every node in the cluster. ?
> > You still have to be very careful with how you use it, but not nearly ?
> > as much as with simpler solutions.
>
> I think the general term is "statement-based replication", not "broadcasting".
Well, the problem is that you can use a statement-based method to
replication from a master to a slave. I think MySQL used to use this
method, or still does, so I don't think the term "statement-based" is
clear enough, though I am open to other terms than "broadcast".
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 15:05:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 15:01:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 15:05:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-20 15:01:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |