From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Date: | 2006-11-18 23:29:07 |
Message-ID: | 200611181529.07429.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Jim,
> That's true of simple query broadcasting (ie: pgpool), but not true
> of Continuent/Sequoia. Continuent's software adds a lot of additional
> features on top of simple query broadcasting, making it far more
> robust than simply spewing queries out to every node in the cluster.
> You still have to be very careful with how you use it, but not nearly
> as much as with simpler solutions.
I think the general term is "statement-based replication", not "broadcasting".
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-20 09:43:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-11-17 01:48:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-11-18 23:32:18 | Re: Ontology on PostgreSQL - is there something? |
Previous Message | Kai-Uwe Sattler | 2006-11-18 21:37:38 | Re: [Fwd: Index Advisor] |