From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Date: | 2006-10-31 19:41:48 |
Message-ID: | 200610311141.49051.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Peter, Greg,
> > See, I was trying to avoid this because I don't think that we can make
> > hard-and-fast rules about priorities by category. For example, a full
> > membership in TPC is $20,000 and we'd be unlikely to be listened to
> > even as full members. Would you rate that over paying for 15
> > different trips by PostgreSQL keynote speakers to South America, Asia
> > and the Middle East, each speaking to between 200 and 3000 people? I
> > wouldn't.
>
> On this particular point, I have the opposite opinion.
Can you explan why? I'm not clear on your priorities.
Please note that the TPC thing was just a hypothetical extreme example,
since as an NPO we can join TPC for $1500 per year. On the other hand,
it's a good example, because a TPC membership does us no good if nobody
attends the TPC meetings ... which gets us into paying for travel again.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-10-31 21:41:43 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-10-31 19:39:55 | Re: CDS was: On what we want to support: travel? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-10-31 20:47:57 | -announce list administration |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-10-31 19:39:55 | Re: CDS was: On what we want to support: travel? |