From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Date: | 2006-10-31 08:38:54 |
Message-ID: | 200610310938.55530.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 23:38 schrieb Josh Berkus:
> See, I was trying to avoid this because I don't think that we can make
> hard-and-fast rules about priorities by category. For example, a full
> membership in TPC is $20,000 and we'd be unlikely to be listened to even
> as full members. Would you rate that over paying for 15 different trips
> by PostgreSQL keynote speakers to South America, Asia and the Middle East,
> each speaking to between 200 and 3000 people? I wouldn't.
On this particular point, I have the opposite opinion.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Sharma | 2006-10-31 11:59:03 | PostgreSQL.ae registered! |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-10-31 07:14:13 | Importand points about PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2006-10-31 14:58:37 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-10-31 05:21:18 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] On what we want to support: travel? |