Re: postgres in HA constellation

From: "Sebastian Reitenbach" <itlistuser(at)rapideye(dot)de>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres in HA constellation
Date: 2006-10-11 14:42:22
Message-ID: 20061011144223.3F4538C03F@ogo.rapideye.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi,

>
> I think this highlights exactly what I'm trying to emphasise: in
> actual, shared-nothing systems like this, there's no possible
> guarantee of "never". There are possible guarantees of "very
> rarely". The problem is, you're already trying to address a teeny
> portion of the likely events on your machines. So you have to assume
> that more than one thing might break at the same time, and have a
> recovery plan for it. I submit that a recovery plan of "restore from
> pg_dump" is usually not going to be enough if it was worth the cost
> and hassle of setting up shared disk failover. YMMV, of course.
>
yes, I did a restore from a dump with pg_dump, that took over a day. maybe I
can speed it up a bit, but this is going to take too long.

Sebastian

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-10-11 15:14:39 Re: Copying data from table to table (cloned tables)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-11 14:33:27 Re: postgres in HA constellation