From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgres in HA constellation |
Date: | 2006-10-11 14:33:27 |
Message-ID: | 20061011143327.GB25181@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:11:08AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> couldn't setup HA on OpenBSD. The key is just to make sure that you
> never bring up two servers on the same data directory.
I think this highlights exactly what I'm trying to emphasise: in
actual, shared-nothing systems like this, there's no possible
guarantee of "never". There are possible guarantees of "very
rarely". The problem is, you're already trying to address a teeny
portion of the likely events on your machines. So you have to assume
that more than one thing might break at the same time, and have a
recovery plan for it. I submit that a recovery plan of "restore from
pg_dump" is usually not going to be enough if it was worth the cost
and hassle of setting up shared disk failover. YMMV, of course.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sebastian Reitenbach | 2006-10-11 14:42:22 | Re: postgres in HA constellation |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-10-11 14:28:44 | Re: postgres in HA constellation |