| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because |
| Date: | 2006-09-23 16:53:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200609231853.24619.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that
> DocBook doesn't support the character or that it can't be
> represented. It's just not supported in the document encoding we're
> using.
No, no, and no.
The reason that it doesn't work is that the document character set for
DocBook is Latin 1, so any attempt to refer to a character not in this
set is going to fail.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User Dpage | 2006-09-23 18:48:06 | pginstaller - pginst: Update GUIDs, bump version string for beta 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-23 16:27:51 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-23 17:35:31 | ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-23 16:27:51 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |