| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because |
| Date: | 2006-09-23 12:19:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20060923121906.GB24323@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:54:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Well you could always use te HTML4 ı which most tools should
> > understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of
> > entity.
>
> Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs before reiterating all the
> suggestions.
Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that DocBook
doesn't support the character or that it can't be represented. It's
just not supported in the document encoding we're using.
Sorry for the noise.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-23 12:49:02 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-23 09:54:47 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-23 12:49:02 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-23 09:54:47 | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because |