From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 Development Cycle |
Date: | 2006-09-23 01:14:17 |
Message-ID: | 200609222114.17916.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 22 September 2006 12:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> writes:
> > Joshua's original mail suggested that only certain features would go in.
> > Is that still on the cards, or will other features be considered if
> > they're ready?
>
> You'll note that Dave's mail said no such thing.
I'd like to see some type of statement from core what level of changes thier
willing to allow in the core for this short release (system catalog changes
seem like a must, and looks like on disk format changes is ok too?) Of
course my angle is making the upgrade from 8.2->8.3 as painless as
possible... if we can avoid a dump/reload cycle then people are less likely
to have to choose between 8.2 and 8.3, which would make everyone happy I
imagine.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-23 01:17:51 | Re: 8.3 Development Cycle |
Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2006-09-23 00:21:14 | Re: 8.3 Development Cycle |