Re: 8.3 Development Cycle

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3 Development Cycle
Date: 2006-09-22 16:40:03
Message-ID: 1155.1158943203@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> writes:
> Joshua's original mail suggested that only certain features would go in.
> Is that still on the cards, or will other features be considered if
> they're ready?

You'll note that Dave's mail said no such thing.

There has been some talk of trying to agree on a roadmap for 8.3 and
coordinate development efforts accordingly --- but that does not
constitute an agreement to reject work not in the roadmap, just some
coordination among those people who wish to coordinate.

> I'm obviously thinking of enums which was ready (for review at least) a
> few weeks ago, but has probably bitrotted slightly since then given the
> number of patches that have landed in the tree. I intended to brush it
> up as soon as the 8.3 tree was open and resubmit it.

Please do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-09-22 16:46:27 Re: advisory locks and permissions
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-09-22 16:39:05 Re: 8.3 Development Cycle