Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES]

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> > > either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
> > > revert to the old way?
> >
> > Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering
> > both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much appear to be one
> > and the same to me anyway.
>
> I'm curious, do you combine any other lists like that? I've played around
> with that idea (for example, I used to combine webmaster emails, pgsql-www,
> and -slaves emails but the slaves traffic was too high so I had to split it
> back out). As someone subscribed to a good dozen pg lists, I've always been
> quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to process... I
> suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but I suspect there
> are some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone
> combine all pg mail to one folder?)

Yes, all mine are in one folder, and I use elm ME. It is faster than a
GUI email client.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +