From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
Date: | 2006-08-23 03:15:59 |
Message-ID: | 200608222315.59454.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> > either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
> > revert to the old way?
>
> Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering
> both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much appear to be one
> and the same to me anyway.
I'm curious, do you combine any other lists like that? I've played around
with that idea (for example, I used to combine webmaster emails, pgsql-www,
and -slaves emails but the slaves traffic was too high so I had to split it
back out). As someone subscribed to a good dozen pg lists, I've always been
quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to process... I
suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but I suspect there
are some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone
combine all pg mail to one folder?)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-23 03:18:54 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-23 03:12:21 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-23 03:18:54 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-23 03:12:21 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |