Re: reindexdb command utlility

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. When we implemented the current
> > elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> > mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
> >
> Agreed.
>
> > If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
> > messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used. But it doesn't (and this is
> > not a request to add one). Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly
> > unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages.
> > NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one. But
> > not INFO.
> >
> LOG would be a good option, but maybe a small hack in reindexdb is
> better.
>
>
> --
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira
> http://www.timbira.com/

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +