From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Henrik Zagerholm <henke(at)mac(dot)se>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: reindexdb command utlility |
Date: | 2006-06-08 00:55:17 |
Message-ID: | 20060608005517.GB1429@timbira.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. When we implemented the current
> elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
>
Agreed.
> If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
> messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used. But it doesn't (and this is
> not a request to add one). Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly
> unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages.
> NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one. But
> not INFO.
>
LOG would be a good option, but maybe a small hack in reindexdb is
better.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
r.diff | text/plain | 719 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-06-08 19:36:33 | Re: Pltcl can't install on windows |
Previous Message | Jan Cruz | 2006-06-07 23:56:22 | length checking and encoding in postgresql 8.1.4 |