From: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: interesting article: Leverage your PostgreSQL V8.1 skills to learn DB2, Version |
Date: | 2006-08-05 12:42:23 |
Message-ID: | 20060805124223.GA15336@mark.mielke.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:01:30AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I found maybe interesting article
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0603wasserman2/
That for the article. I had been meaning to look at DB2, and it gave me a
quick summary.
What I get from the article, though, is that DB2 is more modularized than
PostgreSQL, however, it has concurrency issues. Is this true? Anybody allowed
to comment on the peformance of small-sized (~1 million rows) databases?
I'm not seeing a compelling reason to switch.
Cheers,
mark
--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | andrew | 2006-08-05 13:05:57 | Re: 8.2 features status |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-08-05 08:01:30 | interesting article: Leverage your PostgreSQL V8.1 skills to learn DB2, Version |