| From: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, "Gregory Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Lukas Smith" <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-05 13:05:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1453.24.211.165.134.1154783157.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net writes:
>>> I don't object to someone informally polling people who have claimed a
>>> TODO item and not produced any visible progress for awhile. But I
>>> think
>>> anything like "thou shalt report in once a week" will merely drive
>>> people away from publicly claiming items, if not drive them away from
>>> doing anything at all.
>
>> The former is much more what I had in mind than the latter. Let's do
>> that.
>
> Like I said, no objection here. But who exactly is "we" --- ie, who's
> going to do the legwork? We surely don't want multiple people pestering
> the same developer ...
>
Perl has its pumpking ... maybe we need a designated "holder of the
trunk". I see that as a Core function.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-05 13:19:16 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | mark | 2006-08-05 12:42:23 | Re: interesting article: Leverage your PostgreSQL V8.1 skills to learn DB2, Version |