| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc. |
| Date: | 2006-07-29 17:30:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200607291730.k6THUg926991@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Patch applied. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Ooops,
> I am uncertain at the reason for not knowing __BORLANDC__...
> It will be sure if __BORLANDC__ has the definition.
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
> From: "Tom Lane"
>
>
> > "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
> >> --- src/include/c.h.orig Sat Jul 15 01:38:59 2006
> >> +++ src/include/c.h Sat Jul 15 01:40:04 2006
> >> @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@
> >> #if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)
> >> #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER
> >> #define errcode __vc_errcode
> >> +#if (_MSC_VER > 1400)
> >> #include <crtdefs.h>
> >> +#endif
> >> #undef errcode
> >> #endif
> >>
> >
> > This patch certainly looks like it will break the __BORLANDC__ build ...
> >
> > regards, tom lane
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 17:33:58 | Re: [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 17:15:18 | Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 17:33:58 | Re: [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 17:15:18 | Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in |