From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PGBuildFarm <pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] VPN option? |
Date: | 2006-06-20 18:24:32 |
Message-ID: | 20060620182432.GC29372@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members |
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:56:36PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I had an idea today that could be useful. How would members feel
> about providing a VPN using OpenVPN, connecting back to a server
> with very tightly controlled privileges - maybe Tom Lane and I would
> be the only people allowed to connect back to the client machines,
> or maybe committers - at any rate some very small group. This would
> of course be optional, but it might help to short-circuit problem
> fixes.
I'm in, and I trust you guys not to mess up my machine. :)
> Note: OpenVPN supports almost all the platforms we support, which is
> one reason I picked it, but I am open to other suggestions.
>
> Does this seem like a good idea to anyone?
>
> Another question would be how we manage it? Nail up connections or
> make them on demand? If on demand then the clients would need to
> poll the server to see if a connection is needed.
How is communication with the server handled right now?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2006-06-20 18:35:44 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] VPN option? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-20 17:56:36 | [Pgbuildfarm-members] VPN option? |