From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS |
Date: | 2006-05-22 19:33:34 |
Message-ID: | 20060522193334.GI64371@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:11:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> > > > ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> > > > EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
> > >
> > > And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> > > modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> > > you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.
> >
> > Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
> > tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
> > set to the trigger.
>
> TODO has:
>
> * Allow statement-level triggers to access modified rows
No wonder I missed it, it's under the RI section. :)
Actually, it looks like there's a bunch of things in there that are
generic trigger issues and not really RI issues. And some of those are
exact duplicates of the triggers section... wee!
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-22 19:38:15 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-22 19:15:05 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-22 19:38:15 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-05-22 19:28:39 | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |