From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS |
Date: | 2006-05-22 19:11:14 |
Message-ID: | 200605221911.k4MJBEo15156@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> > > ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> > > EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
> >
> > And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> > modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> > you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.
>
> Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
> tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
> set to the trigger.
TODO has:
* Allow statement-level triggers to access modified rows
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-05-22 19:14:18 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
Previous Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2006-05-22 18:56:14 | Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-05-22 19:14:18 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-22 19:01:51 | pgbench create index anomoly |