| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Radovan Antloga <radovan(dot)antloga(at)siol(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance decrease |
| Date: | 2006-04-20 17:00:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20060420170007.GA49405@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Radovan Antloga wrote:
> I have once or twice a month update on many records (~6000) but
> not so many. I did not expect PG would have problems with
> updating 15800 records.
And generally speaking, it doesn't. But you do need to ensure that
you're vacuuming the database frequently enough. Autovacuum is a good
way to do that.
> My test was on Windows XP SP2.
> I have AMD 64 2.1 GHz cpu with
> 1GB ram.
One think to keep in mind is that the windows code is rather new, so it
is possible to find some performance issues there.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-20 17:02:22 | Re: Checking assumptions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-20 16:51:35 | Re: float8 regression test failure in head |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikael Carneholm | 2006-04-20 18:00:03 | Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-20 16:55:32 | Re: Quick Performance Poll |