| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: float8 regression test failure in head |
| Date: | 2006-04-20 16:51:35 |
| Message-ID: | 19697.1145551895@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
>>> canary, gazelle, and osprey all pass this test just fine. Before
>>> accepting any patches in this area we'd better find out the difference
>>> between the OP's netbsd system and those machines.
> Quoting from my original post "NetBSD-3.99.17/i386" - so what are you
> running?
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl
The entries in the buildfarm list say things like "NetBSD 3.0". Is 3.99
newer? If so, has its underflow handling changed?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-20 17:00:07 | Re: Performance decrease |
| Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2006-04-20 16:34:32 | Re: float8 regression test failure in head |