Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries

Dave Page wrote:
>
> -----Original Message----- From: "Tom Lane"<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> Sent:
> 14/04/06 16:22:45 To: "Martijn van Oosterhout"<kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> Cc:
> "Greg Stark"<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP
> SD"<ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Dave Page"<dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,
> "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hiroshi
> Inoue"<inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Practical impediment to
> supporting multiple SSL libraries
>
> > A fair question to ask is whether psqlODBC would consider
> > going back to a non-hybrid implementation if these features did exist
> > in libpq.
>
> It's not something I want to spend any more time on, and Hiroshi made
> it quite clear on -odbc yesterday that he doesn't want libpq to become
> a requirement of psqlODBC (it's dynamically loaded atm, thus is
> optional).

Hiroshi does not speak for the psqlODBC project. It is a community
project.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +