Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: lmyho <lm_yho(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module
Date: 2006-04-07 07:31:12
Message-ID: 20060407073112.GA22799@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:39:44PM -0700, lmyho wrote:
> > Sounds terribly unlikely, PostgreSQLs licence doesn't conflict with any
> > use anywhere. Can you provide a reference?
> >
>
> I wish things are not like this too! so I won't have to go through so much trouble!
> But that's what happened:-(
>
> This is the ref was given:
> The old / original BSD license is not compatible.
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses

It's talking about BSD with advertising clause which doesn't apply to
postgresql which has the modified BSD licence. I mean, Debian ships
postgresql fine. Like I said, who said it isn't possible?

Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Barwick 2006-04-07 07:32:38 Re: MediaWiki and Postgresql?
Previous Message Ian Barwick 2006-04-07 07:21:41 Re: MediaWiki and Postgresql?