| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomaz Borstnar <tomaz(dot)borstnar(at)over(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: experiences needed - how does Itanium2/1.5GHz(4MB) compare to AMD and Intel CPUs as far as Postgresql is concerned |
| Date: | 2006-03-27 12:14:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20060327121407.GZ80726@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:11:22PM +0100, Tomaz Borstnar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> First tried some searching around, but did not find anything useful
> so I gave up and decided to ask here... I am wondering how do pair of
> 1.5GHz Itanium2(4MB cache) stack up against pair of AMD or Intel server
> CPUs as far as postgresql performance is concerned? Is it worthy or not?
-performance would be a better place to ask, so I'm moving this there.
The general consensus is that your best bet CPU-wise is Opterons.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-03-27 12:16:29 | Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-03-27 12:03:18 | Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gábriel Ákos | 2006-03-27 13:34:32 | count(*) performance |
| Previous Message | Ruben Rubio Rey | 2006-03-27 07:03:03 | Re: Array performance |